The president of United States, Donald TrumpIf things continue this way, he will go down in history as the president who did the least to protect the planet. He cares little that the average global temperature is rising and that the ice caps are melting (something that, however much he denies it, will eventually affect his country as well). He withdrew from the Paris Agreement because He doesn't believe in climate change and unless humanity is making it worse.
This attitude has not pleased many renowned scientists, such as the famous astrophysicist Stephen Hawking. According to him, thanks to Trump we could end up 'having', (in reality, there could be no life at all) a planet Earth with conditions similar to those of Venus, that is, with 250 degree temperatures and sulfuric acid showers, as explained to the BBC.
The situation is alarming and the consequences of the climate change at a global level, which have intensified over the years. Issues such as the rising temperatures, ocean acidification and the increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as hurricanes, wildfires, and droughts have become increasingly common. Furthermore, it has been shown that .
The astrophysicist is very pessimistic about the future of humanity. In his opinion, our days are numberedAt 75 years old, he believes that greed and aggression have become embedded in the human genome. "There's no sign of conflicts diminishing, and the development of military technologies and weapons of mass destruction could lead to disaster," he explained.
The solution to this problem is through colonize other planets, like Mars, which is what we know so far has more or less acceptable conditions to support life. And it is that, if about 3.800-3.100 million years ago it could harbor water, as shown by the images that come to us from NASA satellites, Why couldn't it bring them together again in the medium or long term?
In fact, there is already talk of red planet terraforming, which is certainly a very interesting topic that could save mankind from extinction.
Trump's arrival to the presidency has been a pivotal moment in the recent history of American and global climate policy. Since his first campaign, he has promoted policies that favor the production of fossil fuels, ignoring the alarms of the scientific community and the global consensus on climate change. This return to the rhetoric of "drill, baby, drill" has meant a significant setback in efforts to mitigate the climate change.
In his first term, Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Agreement, an international pact designed to keep global temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius. His justification was that the agreement harmed the U.S. economy, transferring resources to nations that, in his view, did not need them. However, this action isolated the United States on the world stage, weakening international efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This lack of commitment is reflected in the impact of climate change under Donald Trump.
During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump again questioned the existence of climate change, claiming it was a hoax. This skepticism toward science has influenced many of his decisions as president. He eliminated crucial regulations limiting carbon emissions and promoted the exploitation of fossil fuel reserves in the United States. This has contributed not only to an increase in emissions but also to a climate of inaction and distrust toward global efforts to mitigate the effects of climate change. In fact, it is estimated that climate change could be devastating for the environment.
The impact of Trump's policies has been reflected in an analysis of Carbon Brief, where it is estimated that his re-election could result in additional emissions of up to 4,000 million tons of carbon dioxide by 2030, compared to the energy policies of his predecessor, Joe Biden. This figure is alarming and would represent a significant step backward in the fight against climate change.
Trump's strategies not only affect the United States but also have global repercussions. The United States' withdrawal from the Paris Agreement provided an opportunity for other countries to justify their inaction. In a context where global warming is already affecting the lives of millions, the United States' lack of leadership could discourage other countries from meeting their climate commitments. This is crucial in the discussion about how the impact of climate change under Donald Trump has spread.
The effects of climate change are palpable, with extreme weather events becoming more frequent. For example, phenomena such as wildfires in California, floods in the Midwest y most intense hurricanes on the East Coast have led the scientific community to warn of the urgency of addressing this issue. The cost of mitigating these disasters increases with each passing year, and time is running out.
With Trump's arrival to the presidency, many analysts and scientists fear that climate science will be dismantled, as well as the institutions that fight climate change. Despite this, there is a glimmer of hope through local and state leadership. During his first term, many cities and states committed to pursuing climate goals, despite federal policies. Cities like New York, Los Angeles y Chicago have been at the forefront of initiatives that seek to meet the commitments of the Paris Agreement, which may somewhat counteract the impact of climate change under Donald Trump.
Cities are not only responsible for 70% of greenhouse gas emissions, but they also play a crucial role in combating climate change. Their ability to implement renewable energy policies and environmental regulations can make a significant difference in reducing emissions and promoting sustainable practices. Therefore, it is important to analyze how the Local leadership can impact the fight against climate change.
Michael R. Bloomberg, in his role as UN Special Envoy for Climate Ambition and Solutions, has begun exploring ways to maintain the United States' climate commitment through local and private initiativesThis type of leadership from cities and states is critical to filling the void created by the lack of action at the federal level.
As Donald Trump continues to promote policies that ignorantly harm the environment, there is a clear awareness of the need for action and adaptation at different levels of society. Although the challenges are immense, local leadership and community engagement can help build a more sustainable future, generating hope and real change in the fight against climate change.
- Trump's policies have increased greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.
- The lack of federal commitment does not prevent cities and states from implementing effective climate action.
- The global impact of U.S. decisions affects international efforts to combat climate change.
- Local leadership and investment in clean energy are crucial to the future of the planet.
